Optimization of Single-Tooth Rake Angle for Enhanced Cutting Performance in High-Strength Casing Section Milling

Download PDF
Abstract: Section milling of high-strength casings in deep and ultra-deep wells faces significant challenges, including excessive cutting forces, rapid tool wear, and inefficient chip removal. This study proposes a novel cutting performance enhancement method through systematic optimization of the single-tooth rake angle. A 3D explicit dynamic finite element model was developed to simulate orthogonal cutting of P110 casing, validated by lathe experiments with triaxial force measurements. Results demonstrate that a rake angle of γ = 0° optimally balances cutting efficiency and chip control: it minimizes tangential and radial cutting forces, generates short C-shaped chips with 93% mud-carrying efficiency, and eliminates tool jamming risks. Negative rake angles (γ ≤ -2°) produced problematic continuous or powdery chips, while positive angles increased force variability. The 0° configuration reduced specific cutting energy and enhanced tool stability, directly contributing to extended tool life and operational safety. This work provides a foundational strategy for designing next-generation section milling tools targeting high-strength wellbore applications.
Keywords: Section Milling, High-strength Casing, Rake Angle Optimization, Cutting Force Reduction, Chip Morphology
APA Citation: Yufeng Zeng, Chong Xie (2025). Optimization of Single-Tooth Rake Angle for Enhanced Cutting Performance in High-Strength Casing Section Milling. International Journal of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, 6(3), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijmee.v6n3.09

References

  1. Gajdzik, B., R. Wolniak, R. Nagaj, B. V Z Uromskait E Nagaj, and W.W. Grebski. 2024. The influence of the global energy crisis on energy efficiency: A comprehensive analysis. Energies, 17 (4), 947.
  2. Qin, Y., J. Feng, and G. Qin. 2015. The Research and Application of Cementing Techniques on Casing Cutting Window Sidetrack Drilling. 202--207.
  3. Afolabi, F., R. Lacy, R. Asher, and B. Butler. 2007. Rigless Installations of Safety Valves to Implement a Well-Integrity Campaign and Return Wells to Production.
  4. Kong, L., Y. Wang, H. Wang, B. Zhang, and C. Feng. 2024. Mathematical modeling of casing exit windowing by swirling abrasive jet. Geoenergy Science and Engineering 238:212869.
  5. Smalley, M.T., D.W. Teale, and M.A. Haq. 2017. Workover well operations to restore full reservoir access in an underground natural-gas-storage cavern: a case study for developing new technology in dual-string section milling methods.
  6. Tang, M., H. Li, S. He, J. Miao, B. Huang, L. He, and X. Zhou. 2022. Research and Development of High-Performance Section Milling Tool for $Phi$ 139.7-mm Casing. Arab J Sci Eng 47:12205--12222.
  7. Gajdos, M., T. Kristofic, S. Jankovic, G. Horvath, and I. Kocis. 2015. Use of plasma-based tool for plug and abandonment.
  8. Kang, H., J. Cho, J. Park, J. Jang, J. Kim, K. Kim, J. Rostami, and J. Lee. 2016. A new linear cutting machine for assessing the rock-cutting performance of a pick cutter. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci (1997) 88:129--136.
  9. Deshpande, K.M., M.A. Haq, S. Gajula, and D. Teale. 2016. Dual string section milling tool design optimisation using advanced numerical simulations.
  10. Neema, S., L. Singh, F. Chiquiza, J. First, C. Collier, T. Oo, K. Katla, and D. Martin. 2021. Data-Driven Performance Optimization in Section Milling.
  11. Wangsamulia, D., K. Pahlevi, S. Paulus, G. Aditya, H. Tanjung, and R. Dewanda. 2021. Optimising Depth Selection on Section Milling Operation to Secure Sustained Casing Pressure During Plug and Abandonment Operation.
  12. Xiao, S., F. Zhang, and Z. Liang. 2018. A mathematical casing cutting model and operation parameters optimization of a large-diameter deepwater hydraulic cutter. J Pet Sci Eng 162:76--83.
  13. Stowe, C., and A. Ponder. 2011. Performance advance in section milling technology.
  14. Cheng, Y., X. Gai, R. Guan, Y. Jin, and M. Lu. 2023a. Modeling of Dynamic Cutting Force considering Flank Wear and Analysis of Tool Wear Mechanism in Milling 508III Steel. Integr Ferroelectr 233:1--18.
  15. Zhou, X., S. He, M. Tang, Y. Li, G. Zhang, and X. Liu. 2022. Structural design and mathematical cutting model of hydraulic section milling for high-strength casings in small wellbores. J Pet Sci Eng 218:111044.
  16. Kong, C., Z. Liang, D. Zhang, and R. Cai. 2016. Research on cutting mechanics of window bit cutting teeth. Adv Mech Eng 8:1687814016662004.
  17. Johnson, G.R. 1983. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures.
  18. Liu, J., Y. Bai, and C. Xu. 2014. Evaluation of ductile fracture models in finite element simulation of metal cutting processes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 136:011010.
  19. Li, W., X. Ling, and H. Pu. 2020. Development of a cutting force model for a single PDC cutter based on the rock stress state. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:185--200.
  20. Ni, P., Y. Wang, D. Tan, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, Z. Wang, C. Yi, L. Shao, and Y. Lu. 2023. Research on optimization method of stainless steel sawing process parameters based on multi-tooth sawing force prediction model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 128:4513--4533.